State v. Gardner
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtO’Connor, C.J.
{¶ 1} In this appeal, we consider whether an individual who is the subject of an outstanding arrest warrant forfeits all expectations of privacy protected by the Fourth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution and the Ohio Constitution, Article I, Section 19. We hold that he does not. We therefore affirm the decision of the court of appeals, which found error in the trial court’s decision denying a motion to suppress based solely on the notion that an arrest warrant “cleanses” any error by police in seizing an individual later found to be subject to the warrant, and we remand the cause to the trial…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Bell v. WolfishSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Payton v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Florida v. RoyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- State v. Adams (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2015
- State v. CastagnolaOhio Supreme Court · 2015
- State v. Banks-HarveyOhio Supreme Court · 2018
- State v. FarraOhio Court of Appeals · 2022
- State v. MartinOhio Court of Appeals · 2021
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.