Legal Opinion
Auto-Owners Insurance Co. v. Alexander
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided August 28, 2008No. A08A0861PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SMITH, Presiding Judge.
Auto-Owners Insurance Company (“Auto-Owners”) appeals from the grant of summary judgment to the son of its insured, Melanie Alexander, on the issue of automobile insurance coverage. Auto-Owners contends that Alexander’s insurance policy was can-celled for “nonpayment of premium due.” For the reasons that follow, we agree with the trial court and affirm.
Summary judgment is appropriate when no genuine issues of material fact remain and the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. Allstate Ins. Co. v. Ackley, 227 Ga. App. 104 (488 SE2d 85) (1997). We review…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Pennsylvania National Mutual Casualty Insurance v. PersonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1982
- State Highway Department v. W. L. Cobb Construction Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1965
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. HarrisCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1986
- Allstate Insurance v. AckleyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1997
- Atlanta Casualty Co. v. BoatwrightCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2000
3Cited by3 opinions
- Burnside v. Geico General Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2011
- Reynolds v. Infinity General InsuranceSupreme Court of Georgia · 2010
- Reynolds v. Infinity General InsuranceSupreme Court of Georgia · 2010