Legal Opinion

Reynolds v. Infinity General Insurance

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided March 15, 2010No. S09Q1613PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HINES, Justice.

This case is before the Court on a certified question from the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit in litigation involving the effectiveness of a notice of cancellation of a commercial automobile insurance policy.1 Infinity Gen. Ins. Co. v. Reynolds, 570 F3d 1228 (11th Cir. 2009). The question certified is:

Is a notice of cancellation, properly given after the premium is past due, ineffective because it provides an opportunity for the insured to keep the policy in force by paying the past-due premium within the statutory ten-day period?

*87We answer the question…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Pennsylvania National Mutual Casualty Insurance v. PersonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1982
  2. Travelers Indemnity Co. v. GuessSupreme Court of Georgia · 1979
  3. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. DruryCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1996
  4. Chambers v. Washington National InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1941
  5. Norman v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2001

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Southern Pilot Insurance v. CECS, Inc.District Court, N.D. Georgia · 2014
  2. Southern Pilot Insurance v. Cecs, Inc.District Court, N.D. Georgia · 2013
  3. Burnside v. Geico General Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2011
  4. Sims v. First Acceptance Insurance Co. of Georgia, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2013
  5. Southern Pilot Insurance v. CECS, Inc.District Court, N.D. Georgia · 2013

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API