Legal Opinion

Smith v. Lyle

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided February 2, 1929No. File No. 6742PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.

The superintendent of banks appeals from a judgment in favor of defendant in an action brought against E. C. Eyle on an alleged liability as a bank director for excessive loans made by the bank while he was a director.

While the action was pending, Eyle died and his administrator was substituted, and is respondent on this appeal.

On a showing that due notice to creditors was given, that the time within which claims against the estate might be presented has expired, and that no claim has been presented for any of the demands involved in this action, respondent moves to^ dismiss the appeal, for…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. People's Home Savings Bank v. SadlerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1905
  2. Coleman v. BowlesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
  3. Hart v. BjerkeSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1914

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Save Centennial Valley Ass'n, Inc. v. SchultzSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Dodds v. BickleSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1957
  3. City of Plankinton v. KiefferSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1944
  4. City of Brookings v. MartinsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1932
  5. Security Natl. Bank v. KerkhoffSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API