Legal Opinion

City of Brookings v. Martinson

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided August 15, 1932No. File No. 7337PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCampbell, P. J.

Respondent above named has moved to dismiss the appeal herein upon the grounds that all questions involved have become moot.

Conceding that an appeal should be dismissed when the controversy between the parties has ceased to exist, and there is no subject-matter upon which the judgment of the appellate court could operate (Dickson v. Lord, 58 S. D. 643, 238 N. W. 21), and where the only judgment which could be rendered 'by the appellate court would be ineffectual for any purpose (Chicago, M. & St. P. R. Co. v. Commissioners, 28 S. D. 471, 134 N. W. 46), yet such power should be cautiously…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Coolsaet v. City of VeblenSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1930
  2. Dickson v. LordSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1931
  3. Chicago, M. & St. P. Ry. Co. v. CommissionersSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1912
  4. Smith v. LyleSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1929

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Save Centennial Valley Ass'n, Inc. v. SchultzSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Dodds v. BickleSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1957
  3. City of Plankinton v. KiefferSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1944
  4. Campbell v. FritzscheSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1960
  5. Scovel v. Pennington CountySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1938

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API