Legal Opinion

Sweesy v. Hoy

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided November 21, 1933No. Gen. No. 36,140PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Mr. Presiding Justice Sullivan

delivered the opinion of the court.

By this writ of error,' Anna E. Sweesy (hereinafter referred to as complainant), administratrix of the estate of Harry M. Hess, deceased, and guardian of the estate of Harry M. Hess, Jr., seeks to reverse a decree of the superior court dismissing complainant’s original bill for want of equity and granting Mary Olive Hess, one of the defendants and cross complainant (hereinafter referred to as cross complainant), relief as prayed in her cross-bill. Alfred C. Hoy, Carl D. Baker, John L. Hess, Union Bank of Chicago, and the Chicago…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Van Buskirk v. Van BuskirkIllinois Supreme Court · 1893
  2. Lutyens v. AhlrichIllinois Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Niland v. KennedyIllinois Supreme Court · 1925
  4. Hinshaw v. RussellIllinois Supreme Court · 1917
  5. Towle v. WadsworthIllinois Supreme Court · 1893

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Gary-Wheaton Bank v. MeyerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API