Legal Opinion

Purnell v. Morton Live Stock Co.

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided February 4, 1928PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Cook

Plaintiffs appealed from the action of the trial judge sustaining defendants plea in abatement'and dismissing the snit. A preliminary statement is required to present the determinative facts.

Plaintiffs alleging debt by damages for $2500 sued out an original attachment on April 7, 1923, against Morton Live Stock Company, a partnership composed of George B. Croy, and Tom MoGough, non-residents of Tennessee. The attachment was levied under Section '5219, Shannon’s Code, by garnishment to impound the.proceeds of checks issued upon American National Bank, and Commerce Union Bank, both of Lebanon,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Sofge v. LoweTennessee Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Paper Co. v. ShyerTennessee Supreme Court · 1902
  3. Jett v. JettTennessee Supreme Court · 1927
  4. Hurst-Boillin Co. v. KellyTennessee Supreme Court · 1921

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Doebler's AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1870
  2. Taylor v. TaylorSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1870
  3. Harrell v. American Home Mortgage Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1931
  4. Hobbs v. LewisTennessee Supreme Court · 1954
  5. Cotton v. FrazierTennessee Supreme Court · 1936

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API