Legal Opinion

McNally v. Evatt

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided April 24, 1946No. 30524PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBell, J.

The sole question for determination is whether the decision of the Board of Tax Appeals is reasonable and lawful. The appellant lays great stress upon his claim that this was an annuity contract, and that the Board of Tax Appeals treated it as an insurance policy and by reason thereof came to the conclusion which was unreasonable and unlawful.

The contract here in question is an instalment refund life annuity as between the company and-the annuitant, which terminated on the death of the annuitant.

At the time the contract was executed, the annuitant was in her 59th year. Had she lived 18 years…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. City of Findlay v. Hotels.Com, L.P.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 2006
  2. In Re RhineboltUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Ohio · 1991
  3. Weiss v. PorterfieldOhio Supreme Court · 1971
  4. Bronson v. GlanderOhio Supreme Court · 1948
  5. B. F. Goodrich Co. v. PeckOhio Supreme Court · 1954

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API