Legal Opinion

Bronson v. Glander

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided February 4, 1948No. 31071PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtZimmerman, J.

It is the contention of the Tax Commissioner that when the insured died, the policies terminated; that the issuance of the certificates, upon the consideration of the surrender of the policies, constituted new agreements embracing different rights between Bronson, as beneficiary, and the companies, by which he might be paid, if he survived for a sufficient length óf time, an aggregate sum greater than the maturity values of the policies; and that the property rights thereby created in Bronson are subject to taxation as annuities.

In support of this argument, the Tax Commissioner relies on the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1916
  2. Commonwealth v. BeiselSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
  3. Succession of RabouinSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1942
  4. Clark Restaurant Co. v. EvattOhio Supreme Court · 1945
  5. Wilkin v. Board of County Com'rs of Oklahoma CountySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. In Re RhineboltUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Ohio · 1991
  2. In Re ArmisteadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1952
  3. J.G. Wentworth LLC v. Christian, 07 Ma 113 (6-17-2008)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008
  4. United States v. PolingDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 1999
  5. Trangenstein v. Wheaton College Board of TrusteesOhio Court of Appeals · 2002

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API