Legal Opinion

Peterson v. Fertel

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided April 9, 2009No. 282770. No. 282770PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSaad, C. J.

In this medical malpractice action, plaintiff appeals the trial court’s order that granted defendants Dr. David Fertel and Dr. John Schairer’s motions to tax costs and for case evaluation sanctions. For the reasons set forth in this opinion, we affirm.

I. FACTS AND PROCEEDINGS

For purposes of the questions on appeal, the parties do not dispute the essential facts of the case. Plaintiff alleged that defendants, Dr. David Fertel, Dr. John Schairer, Dr. Andrew Zazaian, Dr. David Patterson, and Garden City Hospital, negligently failed to timely diagnose and treat plaintiffs decedent, Andrew…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Maldonado v. Ford Motor Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Wood v. Detroit Automobile Inter-Insurance ExchangeMichigan Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Smith v. KhouriMichigan Supreme Court · 2008
  4. Kloian v. Domino's Pizza, LLCMichigan Court of Appeals · 2007
  5. Haliw v. City of Sterling HeightsMichigan Supreme Court · 2005

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. McNeel v. Farm Bureau General InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 2010
  2. Meemic Insurance v. DTE Energy Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 2011
  3. Badeen v. PAR, Inc.Michigan Court of Appeals · 2013
  4. Fraser Trebilock Davis & Dunlap, PC v. Boyce Trust 2350Michigan Court of Appeals · 2014
  5. Deborah Dehaven v. Farm Bureau General Insurance CompanyMichigan Court of Appeals · 2020

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API