Legal Opinion

Trubin v. Penn Fruit Co.

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided September 8, 1956No. 15236PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VAN DUSEN, District Judge.

This action, resulting from personal injuries suffered by the wife plaintiff when she fell on the pavement in front of one of defendant’s stores in the City of Philadelphia, comes before the court on a motion for new trial filed by plaintiffs after the jury returned a verdict for defendant.

Evidence was introduced at the trial from which the jury could have found that the wife plaintiff was walking south on the 12 to 15 feet wide pavement in front of the store1 2on the west side of Broad Street between 4:45 and 5:30 on a late November afternoon. It had been raining…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Roberts v. CooperSupreme Court of the United States · 1858
  2. Markman v. Fred P. Bell Stores Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
  3. Springfield Township v. Indemnity Insurance Co. of North AmericaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
  4. Palmer v. MillerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1944
  5. Susser v. WileySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1944

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Dioquino v. United of Omaha Life Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2021
  2. Jamie F. v. UnitedHealthcare Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2020
  3. Rosenthal v. Warwick HotelDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API