Legal Opinion
Rosenthal v. Warwick Hotel
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided August 25, 1958No. Civ. A. No. 18829Published
1Opinion of the Court
VAN DUSEN, District Judge.
And Now, August 25, 1958, after consideration of plaintiff’s Motion for New Trial, the oral argument of both counsel for and against this motion, presented in June 1958, and the briefs of both parties, it is ordered that plaintiff’s Motion for New Trial (Document No. 17 im the Clerk’s file) is denied.
After a jury verdict for defendant in a personal injury action based on diversity of citizenship, plaintiff complains that the trial judge submitted the issue of contributory negligence to-the jury. The trial judge’s action in, this regard was not reversible error for…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Johnson v. New York, New Haven & Hartford RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Trowbridge v. Abrasive Co. Of PhiladelphiaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1951
- Seeraty v. Philadelphia Coca-Cola Bottling Co., IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1952
- Trubin v. Penn Fruit Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1956
- Churchfield v. Paul Snyder, Inc.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1952