Legal Opinion
Price v. City of Sutherlin
District Court, D. Oregon
Decided May 9, 2013No. Case No. 6:10-cv-06181-AAPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
AIKEN, Chief Judge.
Defendants Joe Felix, Jay Huskey, Michael Mahler, Ben Woodward, and the City of Sutherlin (“City”) move for summary judgment on plaintiff Erica Price’s claims pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. R. 56. For the reasons set forth below, defendants’ motion is granted in part and denied in part.
BACKGROUND
On October 27, 2009, at approximately 3:45pm and after consuming an unknown quantity of alcohol, plaintiff left her residence to drink at a local bar. Within thirty minutes of her arrival, plaintiff was asked to leave the bar because she was intoxicated and belligerent…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- West v. AtkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Castillo v. BushDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2024
- Kerr-Daly v. City of EugeneDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2025
- Kristiansen v. AmericaDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2025
- Mead v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2025
- Toney v. Medford Police DepartmentDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2019