Legal Opinion

In re Marriage of Casey

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided February 9, 1999No. WD 55630Published

1Opinion of the Court

SPINDEN, Judge.

David Casey appeals the circuit court’s denial of his motion to modify child support. He contends that the circuit court erred in not following mandatory guidelines for use of Form N° 14 under Rule 88.01 and in not ordering his former wife, Janice Michelle Newman, to pay child support for their minor child. We affirm the circuit court’s judgment.

Casey and Newman divorced on March 13, 1991, and the circuit court ordered that the couple’s minor child be placed in Newman s custody. On September 8, 1992, the circuit court ordered that custody of the child be transferred to Casey,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Neal v. NealSupreme Court of Missouri · 1997
  2. Graves v. GravesMissouri Court of Appeals · 1998
  3. Smith v. SmithMissouri Court of Appeals · 1998
  4. Gibson v. GibsonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API