Legal Opinion
Amerikohl Mining, Inc. v. Mount Pleasant Township
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
Decided March 11, 1999PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FRIEDMAN, Judge.
Amerikohl Mining, Inc. (Amerikohl) appeals from an order of the Court of Common Pleas of Westmoreland County (trial court) declaring that a January 24, 1996 Settlement Agreement between Amerikohl and Mount Pleasant Township (Township) is applicable to all of Amerikohl’s present and future mining activities. We reverse.
In August 1995, the Township adopted Ordinance No. 112 (Ordinance), which prohibited nuisances on private or public property in the Township. Section 11(7) of the Ordinance prohibits
[operating or to permit the operation of tools or equipment used in drilling…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Kaplan v. Cablevision of PA, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
- Lower Frederick Township v. ClemmerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
- Frickert v. Deiter Bros. Fuel Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
- Slater v. Pearle Vision Center, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
- Trinity Lutheran Evangelical Church v. MayCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Friia v. FriiaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
- Two Rivers Terminal, L.P. v. Chevron USA, Inc.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2000
- Earl Township v. Reading Broadcasting, Inc.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
- Fortwangler v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
- Guttha v. Commonwealth, Department of TransportationCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.