United States v. Saden
District Court, S.D. New York
At Law. Action by the United States against Herman A. Salen. On motion to amend complaint, and defendant’s motion to dismiss complaint.
1Opinion of the Court
MANTON, District Judge.
The plaintiff moves to amend its complaint and the defendant moves to dismiss the complaint. Both motions will be considered together.
The complaint alleges that between the 25th of February, 1910, and the 9th of June, 1913, the defendant imported into the United States laces, embroideries, trimmings, etc., which were subject to duty by law; that they were entered at false values, and for failure to enter the true value the United States has suffered loss in the collection of customs duties, and demands damages at $196,651.47. The defendant has not only had this lawsuit…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Coffey v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Gould v. Evansville & Crawfordsville R. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1876
- United States v. ZuckerSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- Bissell v. Spring Valley TownshipSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Alley v. NottSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- United States v. United States Gypsum Co.District Court, District of Columbia · 1943
- Aycock v. O'BRIENCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1928
- United States v. 2,180 Cases of ChampaigneCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1926
- National Surety Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1927
- The K-5691District Court, E.D. New York · 1931