Legal Opinion
Aycock v. O'BRIEN
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided October 29, 1928No. 5501PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DIETRICH, Circuit Judge.
Acting under the provisions of sections 3929 and 4041, R. SI U. S. (39 USCA §§ 259, 732), the Postmaster General on December 31, 1927, issued a “fraud order” of the usual form, forbidding the postmaster at Los Angeles to pay money orders or to deliver letters addressed to Ayeock Medical Institute, Ayeock Medicine Combany, Ayeock Medical Company, and Charles P. Ayeock, or their officers or agents, at Los Angeles. The order was issued pursuant to a finding by the Solicitor of the Department, made after a hearing at which the parties named appeared and adduced evidence,…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Coffey v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- American School of Magnetic Healing v. McAnnultySupreme Court of the United States · 1902
- AMERICAN SCHOOL OF MAGNETIC HEALING v. McANNULTYSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
- Stone v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- United States Ex Rel. Milwaukee Social Democratic Publishing Co. v. BurlesonSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Whitacre Partnership v. Biosignia, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2004
- Baker v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1940
- National Conference on Legalizing Lotteries, Inc. v. GoldmanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1936
- Jeffries v. OlesenDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1954
- Rood v. GoodmanCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1936
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.