Legal Opinion

Cateora v. British Atlantic Assurance, Ltd., of Nassau

District Court, S.D. Texas

Decided March 22, 1968No. Civ. A. 67-B-46PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

GARZA, District Judge.

This suit involves an action for declaratory judgment upon an admiralty and maritime claim within the meaning of Rule 9(h) and Rule 57, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and filed pursuant to the provisions of Title 28, Section 2201, U.S.Code.

The Plaintiff, Ernest W. Cateora, is seeking to require British Atlantic Assurance, Ltd., of Nassau, Bahamas (hereinafter called “British Atlantic”) and its alleged agents, Stanley R. Werts, individually and d/b/a Stan Mac Insurance Agency (hereinafter called “Werts”), Millard E. Gaskill (hereinafter called…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Diamond v. DuncanTexas Supreme Court · 1915
  2. McCann v. Falgout Boat Co.District Court, S.D. Texas · 1968
  3. Diamond v. DuncanTexas Supreme Court · 1915
  4. Texas Menhaden Company v. Philip PalermoCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1964
  5. Insurance Co. of Pennsylvania v. AmaralDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1968

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Carter Lincoln-Mercury, Inc. v. Emar Group, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1994
  2. Ed and Fred, Inc. v. Puritan Marine Insurance Underwriters Corp., Mid Atlantic Insurance Company, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975
  3. Concordia Co. v. PanekCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1997
  4. Alaska Barite Co. v. Freighters Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 1972
  5. Higginbotham & Associates, Inc. v. GreerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1987

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API