Legal Opinion

Insurance Co. of Pennsylvania v. Amaral

District Court, S.D. Texas

Decided February 28, 1968No. Civ. A. No. 67-G-159PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NOEL, District Judge.

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

This is an action, alleged to be upon an admiralty and maritime claim under Rule 9(h), Fed.R.Civ.P., for declaratory judgment pursuant to 28 U.S.C. section 2201 and Rule 57, Fed.R.Civ.P. Plaintiff has instituted this suit for the purpose of obtaining a determination from this court as to whether a constructive total loss of defendant’s shrimp trawler, Miss Heather, was covered by the terms of a marine hull insurance policy issued by plaintiff to defendant.

Defendant, maintaining that a declaratory judgment action cannot rest upon *46admiralty or maritime…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Insurance Co. v. DunhamSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
  2. McCann v. Falgout Boat Co.District Court, S.D. Texas · 1968
  3. Texas Menhaden Company v. Philip PalermoCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1964

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Cateora v. British Atlantic Assurance, Ltd., of NassauDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1968
  2. Arkwright-boston Manufacturers Mutual Insurance v. Bauer Dredging Co.District Court, S.D. Texas · 1977
  3. Kalmbach, Inc. v. Insurance Co. of the State of Pennsylvania, Inc.District Court, D. Alaska · 1976
  4. Royal Insurance Co. of America v. HansenDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1988
  5. Insurance Co. of North America v. Langan Construction Co.District Court, S.D. Alabama · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API