Legal Opinion

Roberts v. Ray Bell Film Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided November 24, 1939No. 32,235PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Julius J. Olson, Justice.

Relator brings certiorari to review an order of the industrial commission denying him compensation on the ground that the injury for which an award was sought “did not arise out of and in the course of the employment of said employe.”

The record permits a finding of the following facts: Employe was a salesman for Ray Bell Film Company. His assigned territory was South Carolina. Bell company is engaged in the business of film advertising. The employe’s duties were to call upon merchants, theater owners, and other businessmen who might be prevailed upon to enter into…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Stansberry v. Monitor Stove Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1921
  2. Reinhard v. Universal Film Exchange, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1936
  3. McCarty v. Twin City Egg & Poultry Ass'nSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1927
  4. Johnson v. Nash-Finch Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1936

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Erickson v. Erickson CompanySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1942
  2. Schmillen v. Dave Schroeder GrocerySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API