Legal Opinion

Reinhard v. Universal Film Exchange, Inc.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided May 15, 1936No. 30,744PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Julius J. Olson, Justice.

Upon relator’s petition this court granted certiorari to review an order of the industrial commission denying his claim to compensation under the workmen’s compensation act.

The cause was heard by and before a referee who made finding's disalloAving compensation on the ground that the accident did not arise out of and in the course of relator’s employment. Upon appeal to the industrial commission the findings of the referee Avere adopted and affirmed.

Relator Avas employed by respondent employer under a Minnesota contract of hire. His territory included the northwestern…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Claim of Dependents of Marks v. GrayNew York Court of Appeals · 1929
  2. Maher v. Duluth Yellow Cab Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1927
  3. Kuehmichel v. Western Union Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
  4. Kallgren v. C. W. Lunquist Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1927
  5. Lausche v. Denison-Harding Chevrolet Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1932

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Burke v. B. F. Nelson Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1945
  2. Kiley v. Sward-Kemp Drug Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1943
  3. Kayser v. Carson Pirie Scott & Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1938
  4. Linzy v. Cameron's, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1958
  5. In Re LinzyIdaho Supreme Court · 1958

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API