Legal Opinion

Ross v. Spaniol

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided November 30, 1926PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRand, J.

Plaintiff and others, as employees of the defendant Woodruff, performed labor in repairing an airplane, which had been delivered to their said employer by its owners, the defendants Spaniol and Thomas, under a contract by the terms of which Woodruff agreed to'make the repairs for a consideration to be paid to him. Each of said employees filed a separate notice of lien upon the airplane for their share of the labor, claiming to be entitled thereto under the provisions of Section 10272, Or. L. Plaintiff commenced this suit for the foreclosure of his own lien and as assignee of the liens of his…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. McDearmid v. John R. Foster & Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1887

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Yellow Manufacturing Acceptance Corp. v. BristolOregon Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Richmond v. Fields Chevrolet Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1972
  3. McKinley v. TiceOregon Supreme Court · 1929
  4. Coast Engine & MacHine Works v. BarbeeOregon Supreme Court · 1929
  5. Goodrich Silvertown Stores v. CollinsOregon Supreme Court · 1941

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API