Legal Opinion
Martin v. Reynolds Metals Company
District Court, D. Oregon
Decided December 11, 1963No. Civ. 61-545PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
EAST, District Judge.
The plaintiffs (Martin) are the owners of real property referred to as the Trout-dale Ranch, located just east of the Sandy River adjacent to its confluence with the Columbia River in Multnomah County, Oregon, upon which they have during the past years operated a livestock grazing ranch.
The defendant corporation (Reynolds) is a Delaware corporation with its principal place of business in Virginia and having extensive and wide-spread general public-consumer business. Reynolds is authorized to engage in its business in Oregon, and has been for some years past and is now…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Chaplinsky v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Guaranty Trust Co. v. YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Guaranty Trust Co. v. YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Near v. Minnesota Ex Rel. OlsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Dino DeLaurentiis Cinemato-Grafica, S.P.A. v. D-150, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1966
- Leonardini v. Shell Oil Co.California Court of Appeal · 1989
- Sims Snowboards, Inc., a California Corporation v. Craig Kelly and the Burton Corp., a Vermont Corporation Dba Burton SnowboardsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
- Kaiser Trading Co. v. Associated Metals & Minerals Corp.District Court, N.D. California · 1970
- Bunch v. Artec International Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1983
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.