Legal Opinion

Lynch v. City of New York

New York Court of Appeals

Decided June 30, 2014PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Read, J.

We are asked on this appeal whether Retirement and Social Security Law § 480 (b) requires the City of New York (the City) to make “Increased-Take-Home-Pay” (ITHP) pension contributions on behalf of New York City police officers and firefighters appointed on or after July 1, 2009. These public employees are tier 3 members of the New York City Police Pension Fund (the PPF) and the New York City Fire Department Pension Fund (the FDPF), respectively. Section 480 (b), enacted in 1974 as part of an omnibus pension clean-up bill (see L 1974, ch 510, § 24), was…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Civil Service Employees Ass'n v. ReganNew York Court of Appeals · 1988

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. King v. New York City Employees Retirement SystemDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2016
  2. Lynch v. City of New YorkNew York Supreme Court · 2017
  3. Lane v. WhinneryDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2025
  4. Lynch v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2018
  5. Lynch v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2021

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API