Legal Opinion

Botton v. State

Washington Supreme Court

Decided November 17, 1966No. 37916PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*752Hill, J.

The State of Washington, through its Department of Game, acquired by purchase a waterfront lot on Phantom Lake (nonnavigable) which it has developed to be used as a public fishing access area. Its use or abuse, for that purpose, has resulted in the present action by other owners of waterfront property on the lake, asking that the state be enjoined from maintaining its public access area. The trial court made very comprehensive findings of fact:

Since the defendant, through its Game Department, put in the public access area, the plaintiffs have suffered the following as a result of it:

1.…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Duval v. ThomasSupreme Court of Florida · 1959
  2. Johnson v. SeifertSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1960
  3. Proctor v. SimWashington Supreme Court · 1925
  4. State v. SturtevantWashington Supreme Court · 1913
  5. Brown v. ChaseWashington Supreme Court · 1923

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Stempel v. Department of Water ResourcesWashington Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Bach v. SarichWashington Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Pierce v. RileyMichigan Court of Appeals · 1978
  4. Clippinger v. BirgeCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1976
  5. Rose v. RiedingerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1975

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API