Legal Opinion

Rose v. Riedinger

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided April 18, 1975No. 1006-3PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMunson, J.

The court embarks upon another chapter in the continuing saga of land ownership along the shore and beneath the waters of Lake Chelan. Wilbour v. Gallagher, 77 Wn.2d 306, 462 P.2d 232, 40 A.L.R.3d 760 (1969). This case involves disputed boundary lines and ownership of property held by adjacent owners, as well as additions accumulating upon such property due to a flood which occurred in 1972.

The issues presented may be consolidated into the following questions:(1) Does a 1964 judgment establishing a common property boundary between predecessors in interest to the present parties control the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Wilbour v. GallagherWashington Supreme Court · 1969
  2. Hirt v. EntusWashington Supreme Court · 1950
  3. Harper v. HolstonWashington Supreme Court · 1922
  4. Hudson House, Inc. v. RozmanWashington Supreme Court · 1973
  5. Hardcastle v. Greenwood Savings & Loan Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1973

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Farmers Insurance v. U. S. F. & G. Co.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1975
  2. Clippinger v. BirgeCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1976
  3. Puyallup Tribe of Indians v. Port of TacomaDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API