Legal Opinion

People v. Guzman

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 13, 1993No. B059789PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

WOODS, (Fred), J.

Appellants (Marco Aurelio Guzman and Ruben Correa) were tried without a jury and found guilty of narcotics-related offenses. The Attorney General concedes the record “does not reflect an express waiver of the right to a jury trial by appellants].’’ The dispositive question is this: does the record, under the totality of circumstances, show a voluntary and intelligent jury waiver by appellants? (People v. Howard (1992) 1 Cal.4th 1132, 1175 [5 Cal.Rptr.2d 268, 824 P.2d 1315].) The answer is “no.” We reverse.

Discussion

Prior to People v. Howard the requirements of…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. In Re TahlCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
  3. People v. HowardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
  4. In Re YurkoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  5. People v. HolmesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. People v. SullivanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
  2. People v. ErnstCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
  3. People v. HowardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
  4. People v. HowardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API