People v. Guzman
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
WOODS, (Fred), J.
Appellants (Marco Aurelio Guzman and Ruben Correa) were tried without a jury and found guilty of narcotics-related offenses. The Attorney General concedes the record “does not reflect an express waiver of the right to a jury trial by appellants].’’ The dispositive question is this: does the record, under the totality of circumstances, show a voluntary and intelligent jury waiver by appellants? (People v. Howard (1992) 1 Cal.4th 1132, 1175 [5 Cal.Rptr.2d 268, 824 P.2d 1315].) The answer is “no.” We reverse.
Discussion
Prior to People v. Howard the requirements of…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- In Re TahlCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
- People v. HowardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
- In Re YurkoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- People v. HolmesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- People v. SullivanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
- People v. ErnstCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
- People v. HowardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
- People v. HowardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994