People v. Ernst
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
GEORGE, J.
—In People v. Howard (1992) 1 Cal.4th 1132 [5 Cal.Rptr. 268, 824 P.2d 1315] (Howard), we held that the defendant validly admitted having served an alleged prior prison term, despite the trial court’s failure to advise him expressly of the privilege against self-incrimination, because, “considering the totality of the relevant circumstances, . . . defendant’s admission of the prior conviction was voluntary and intelligent. . . .” (Id. at p. 1180.) In the present case, the People contend that the totality-of-the-circumstances test applied in Howard also should apply when a…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Duncan v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- In Re TahlCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
- People v. HowardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
- People v. TerryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by51 opinions
- People v. FloodCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
- The People v. MaiCalifornia Supreme Court · 2013
- People v. BradfordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
- People v. . ScottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
- People v. FrenchCalifornia Supreme Court · 2008
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.