Legal Opinion

People v. Ernst

California Supreme Court

Decided October 13, 1994No. S030415PublishedCited by 51 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

GEORGE, J.

—In People v. Howard (1992) 1 Cal.4th 1132 [5 Cal.Rptr. 268, 824 P.2d 1315] (Howard), we held that the defendant validly admitted having served an alleged prior prison term, despite the trial court’s failure to advise him expressly of the privilege against self-incrimination, because, “considering the totality of the relevant circumstances, . . . defendant’s admission of the prior conviction was voluntary and intelligent. . . .” (Id. at p. 1180.) In the present case, the People contend that the totality-of-the-circumstances test applied in Howard also should apply when a…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Duncan v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. In Re TahlCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
  4. People v. HowardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
  5. People v. TerryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by51 opinions

  1. People v. FloodCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
  2. The People v. MaiCalifornia Supreme Court · 2013
  3. People v. BradfordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
  4. People v. . ScottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
  5. People v. FrenchCalifornia Supreme Court · 2008

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API