Legal Opinion
State v. Moncayo
New Mexico Court of Appeals
Decided May 31, 2012No. Docket 31,146PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CASTILLO, Chief Judge.
{1} Defendant appeals his convictions for possession of a controlled substance with intent to distribute contrary to NMSA 1978, Section 30-31-20(A)(3) (2006), and tampering with evidence contrary to NMSA 1978, Section 30-22-5 (2003), arguing that his Confrontation Clause rights were violated when a chemical forensic report was admitted into evidence based upon testimony from an analyst who had not prepared the report. Defendant further argues that the court erred in allowing the trial to go forward after Defendant exhibited high blood pressure on the day of trial.…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Ohio v. RobertsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Bullcoming v. New MexicoSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- State v. TollardoNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2012
- State v. BalderamaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2004
- State v. BarrNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2009
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- State v. FloresNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2014
- State v. HuettlNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2013
- State v. FloresNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2014
- State v. FloresNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2014
- State v. GarciaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2013
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.