Legal Opinion

Baxter v. City of Preston

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided February 13, 1989No. 17301PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BISTLINE, Justice.

This is a zoning case. Prior to 1984, defendant Thayne Corbridge allowed about 20 head of cattle to graze on two abutting parcels of his land. The parcels are separated by a concrete drainage ditch. Cor-bridge would farm the western parcel, and once harvested, the cattle would graze on both. Prior to 1984, the cattle were not fed hay or silage on the parcels, nor were they stored there through the winter. In 1984 Corbridge constructed a portable manger and a shed on the eastern property. Manure accumulated. He hauled hay to the cattle and kept them on the premises throughout…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. O'Connor v. City of MoscowIdaho Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Edmonds v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
  3. Cullen v. Building Inspector of North AttleboroughMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1968
  4. Johnny Cake, Inc. v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
  5. Knowlton v. Browning-Ferris Industries of Virginia, Inc.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1979

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Meridian Minerals Co. v. King CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1991
  2. Kootenai County v. Harriman-SaylerIdaho Supreme Court · 2012
  3. Smith County Regional Planning Commission v. Hiwassee Village Mobile Home Park, LLCTennessee Supreme Court · 2010
  4. Eddins v. City of LewistonIdaho Supreme Court · 2010
  5. Taylor v. Board of County CommissionersIdaho Court of Appeals · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API