Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Eddins v. City of Lewiston

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided November 26, 2010No. 37209PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

J. JONES, Justice.

Steven Lee Eddins appeals the district court’s decision upholding the City of Lewiston’s determination that he is prohibited from replacing recreational vehicles currently located in his manufactured home park. We reverse.

I

Factual and Procedural Background

Steven Lee Eddins has owned and operated a manufactured home park in Lewiston, Idaho, since 2000. Eddins has continuously rented out a combination of standard mobile home spaces and recreational vehicle spaces to various tenants. 1 Eddins has a license to operate a manufactured home park, but does not have a license to…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Mitchell v. W. T. Grant Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Price v. PAYETTE CTY. BD. OF CTY. COM'RSIdaho Supreme Court · 1998
  3. O'Connor v. City of MoscowIdaho Supreme Court · 1949
  4. Bastian v. City of Twin FallsIdaho Court of Appeals · 1983
  5. Gordon Paving Co. v. Blaine County Board of County CommissionersIdaho Supreme Court · 1977

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Hawkins v. Bonneville County Board of CommissionersIdaho Supreme Court · 2011
  2. Jasso v. CAMAS COUNTYIdaho Supreme Court · 2011
  3. Hawkins v. BONNEVILLE COUNTY BD. OF COM'RSIdaho Supreme Court · 2011
  4. Rangen, Inc. v. Idaho Department of Water ResourcesIdaho Supreme Court · 2016
  5. Stagecoach Trails Mhc, L.L.C. v. City of BensonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2013

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API