Legal Opinion

Ghersi v. Salazar

Utah Supreme Court

Decided October 28, 1994No. 930243PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STEWART, Associate Chief Justice:

Dante Ghersi appeals from a summary judgment holding that his personal injury action against Huish Detergent, Inc. (“Huish”), and its employee, Joe Salazar, was barred by Utah Code Ann. § 35-1-60, the exclusive remedy provision of the Utah Workers’ Compensation Act (the “Act”). We affirm.

I

The facts are undisputed. Adia Personnel Services, Inc. (“Adia”), a temporary labor service, contracted with defendant Huish to provide Huish with temporary employees. Huish paid Adia an hourly fee for each temporary employee, and Adia compensated the temporary employee…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Dennis L. Capps v. N.L. Baroid-Nl Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1986
  2. Whitehead v. Safway Steel Products, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1985
  3. Novenson v. Spokane Culvert & Fabricating Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Danek v. Meldrum Manufacturing & Engineering Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
  5. Bambrough v. BethersUtah Supreme Court · 1976

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Langfitt v. Federal Marine Terminals, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2011
  2. Walker v. U.S. General, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Utah Home Fire Insurance Co. v. ManningUtah Supreme Court · 1999
  4. McNeil Engineering & Land Surveying, LLC v. BennettCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2011
  5. Nautilus Ins. Co. v. K. Smith Builders, Ltd.District Court, D. Hawaii · 2010

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API