Legal Opinion
Jacobson v. Maryland Racing Commission
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Decided March 3, 1971No. [No. 301, September Term, 1970.]PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHammond, C. J.
Howard Jacobson, licensed by the Maryland Racing Commission (the Commission) as an owner and as a trainer of race horses, claimed three horses — Shoeless Rebel, Wag Wag and Bar Tab — in claiming races at the Bowie race meeting that ended March 6, 1969 and within sixty days of their respective purchase, sold the horses in New York during the Aqueduct race meeting. The Stewards suspended Jacobson’s licenses, relying on Rule 80 of the Maryland Rules of Racing (the Rules) which prohibits one who has claimed a horse in a claiming race in Maryland from selling it within sixty days of the date of…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- McGowan v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- United States v. Aluminum Co. of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1945
- Strassheim v. DailySupreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Fall v. EastinSupreme Court of the United States · 1909
- Skiriotes v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Christ v. Maryland Department of Natural ResourcesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1994
- Lussier v. Maryland Racing CommissionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1996
- Heft v. Maryland Racing CommissionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1991
- State v. BundrantAlaska Supreme Court · 1976
- Silbert v. RamseyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1984
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.