Legal Opinion

Heft v. Maryland Racing Commission

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided July 24, 1991No. 78, September Term, 1989PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ELDRIDGE, Judge.

This case arose out of a thoroughbred horse race at the Laurel Race Course; it concerns the plaintiffs claim that the horse finishing first in the race should have been disqualified because he interfered with two other horses during the running of the race. The principal issue on appeal is whether, under the Maryland Racing Commission’s rules applicable at the time of the race here involved, COMAR 09.10.01.01 to 09.10.01.78, or under due process principles, the Racing Commission was required to conduct a hearing to review the decision of the stewards when no timely objection…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Atlas Roofing Co. v. Occupational Safety and Health Review Comm'nSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  2. Bulluck v. Pelham Wood ApartmentsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1978
  3. Duignan v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  4. Consumer Protection Division Office of the Attorney General v. Consumer Publishing Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1985
  5. Department of Transportation v. ArmacostCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1984

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Lussier v. Maryland Racing CommissionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1996
  2. Maryland Transportation Authority v. KingCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2002
  3. Maryland State Police v. ZeiglerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1993
  4. Maryland Aggregates Ass'n v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1995
  5. Jordan Towing, Inc. v. Hebbville Auto Repair, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2002

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API