Legal Opinion

Goslin v. Goslin

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided March 7, 1963No. Calendar 47, Docket 49,413PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtOtis M. Smith, J.

Plaintiffs, Harold T. Goslin and Margaret E. Goslin, husband and wife, sued Charlotte Goslin for specific performance. Plarold T. Goslin is a son of Charlotte Goslin. The trial court found that an enforceable contract for the sale of realty was entered into between plaintiffs and the defendant and her deceased husband, Alfred J. Goslin. Charlotte Goslin appeals from the decree of specific performance.

The question for review is whether or not, in view of the facts and circumstances, 2 receipts are sufficient as memoranda to take the transaction out of the statute of frauds. CL 1948, § 566.108…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Duke v. MillerMichigan Supreme Court · 1959

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Forge v. SmithMichigan Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Opdyke Investment v. NORRIS GRAIN COMPANYMichigan Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Jim-Bob, Inc v. MehlingMichigan Court of Appeals · 1989
  4. Zurcher v. HerveatMichigan Court of Appeals · 2000
  5. In Re Rudell EstateMichigan Court of Appeals · 2009

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API