Legal Opinion

State v. Pike

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided June 22, 1982No. 1 CA-CR 5576-PRPublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

JACOBSON, Presiding Judge.

The question before the court is whether the trial court erred in reducing the defendant’s sentence from not less than 40 nor more than 50 years to not less than 15 nor more than 30 years. The state brings this petition for review pursuant to 17 A.R.S., Rules of Criminal Procedure, Rule 32.9, from the trial court’s order granting the defendant’s petition for post-conviction relief, and denying the state’s motion for rehearing. We find that the trial court did err in granting the petition for post-conviction relief.

On July 10, 1975, the defendant was convicted…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Rummel v. EstelleSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. Weems v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
  3. Hutto v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. State v. EspinosaArizona Supreme Court · 1966
  5. State v. FilipovCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1977

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State v. MannArizona Supreme Court · 1997
  2. State v. BishopCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1983
  3. State v. FayleCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1982
  4. State v. CooperCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1990
  5. State v. GlasscockCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1990

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API