Legal Opinion

State v. Espinosa

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided December 7, 1966No. 1652PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

'LOCKWOOD, Justice.

The appellant, Peter Robert Espinosa, was charged by information with illegally selling the narcotic drug heroin in violation of A.R.S. § 36-1002.02. He pleaded not guilty to the charge. Trial was held and defendant was found guilty and sentenced to five to six years in the State Prison. Espinosa was found to be indigent and the same counsel who represented him at trial was appointed to represent him for the purposes of this appeal.

The appellant contends that the witness, Captain Kempe, a police chemist, was not qualified to state an opinion as to whether a particular…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. BallesterosArizona Supreme Court · 1966
  2. City of Phoenix v. BrownArizona Supreme Court · 1960
  3. In Re LewkowitzArizona Supreme Court · 1950
  4. State v. TaylorArizona Supreme Court · 1957
  5. State v. GastelumArizona Supreme Court · 1953

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. State v. FreitasHawaii Supreme Court · 1979
  2. In Re Dos Cabezas Power DistrictCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1972
  3. State v. DeddensArizona Supreme Court · 1975
  4. State v. KevilArizona Supreme Court · 1974
  5. State v. GardnerUtah Supreme Court · 1997

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API