Legal Opinion

Bronson v. Albion Telephone Co.

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided January 8, 1903No. 12,497PublishedCited by 14 opinions

Error from the district court for Boone county. Action to obtain a perpetual injunction against the commission of an alleged trespass threatened. Heard below before PAUL; J. Judgment on demurrer for defendant.

1Opinion of the Court

Pound, C.

The plaintiff applied for an injunction to restrain defendant, a telephone company, from mutilating or injuring certain trees which she had planted in the street along and adjacent to her property. The trees had been planted under the provisions of a municipal ordinance and were rightfully in the street by virtue of sections 3-7, article 4, chapter 2,* and subdivision 24, section 69, article 1, chapter 14, Compiled Statutes.† The company was erecting poles and wires under a franchise from the city. Upon demurrer to the petition, the district court held that no cause of action was…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. United States v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
  2. Cater v. Northwestern Telephone Exchange Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1895
  3. Pierce v. DrewMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1883
  4. Eels v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1894
  5. Julia Building Ass'n v. Bell Telephone Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1885

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Acme Cement Plaster Co. v. American Cement Plaster Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1914
  2. Frazier v. East Tennessee Telephone Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1905
  3. McCook Irrigation & Water Power Co. v. CrewsNebraska Supreme Court · 1903
  4. Norman Milling & Grain Co. v. BethuremSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
  5. Slabaugh v. Omaha Electric Light & Power Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1910

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API