Legal Opinion

McCook Irrigation & Water Power Co. v. Crews

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided October 7, 1903No. 12,076PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Appeal from the district court for Hitchcock county: George W. Norris, Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

Pound, C.

The plaintiff is operating an irrigation ditch, taking water from the Republican river as appropriator. The defendants are riparian owners upon the Frenchman, a principal tributary of the Republican river immediately above the plaintiff’s canal, and claim a right to irrigate their lands with the water of said stream, both by virtue of their riparian rights and under subsequent appropriations. With the latter we have no concern. This suit is brought to enjoin the defendants from diverting water *111necessary to the conduct and operation of the plaintiff’s ditch, and claimed by the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Crawford Co. v. HathawayNebraska Supreme Court · 1903
  2. Meng v. CoffeeNebraska Supreme Court · 1903
  3. Hoagland v. Van EttenNebraska Supreme Court · 1888
  4. Bronson v. Albion Telephone Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1903
  5. Hoagland v. Van EttenNebraska Supreme Court · 1891

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Nebraska v. WyomingSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Ormsby County v. KearneyNevada Supreme Court · 1914
  3. Enterprise Irrigation District v. Tri-State Land Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1912
  4. St. Germain Irrigating Ditch Co. v. Hawthorne Ditch Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1913
  5. Wasserburger v. CoffeeNebraska Supreme Court · 1966

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API