Legal Opinion
Varsity Watch Co. v. United States
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
Decided March 25, 1947No. 4558PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBland, Judge
In 1942 appellant imported into the United States from Switzerland certain wrist watch cases of two types, one for use by ladies, the other for use chiefly by gentlemen. The merchandise was assessed for duty at the rate of 40 cents each plus 30 per centum ad valorem under the provisions of paragraph 367 (f) (2) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as modified by the trade agreement with Switzerland, effective February 15, 1936, 69 Treas. Dec. 74, T. D. 48093. The trade agreement modification of paragraph 367 (f) corresponds with the provisions of the said paragraph in all respects except as to the rate…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Merritt v. WelshSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
- United States v. Aetna Explosives Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1921
- Aetna Explosives Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1919
- United States v. International Forwarding Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1927
- United States v. Meadows & Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1915
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Alcan Aluminum Corporation v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1999
- Heartland By-Products, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1999
- North American Processing Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1999
- Ciba-Geigy Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2001
- Bestfoods v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2000
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.