Legal Opinion

State v. Barber

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided August 12, 1986No. 511A85PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MITCHELL, Justice.

The defendant has brought forward assignments of error by which he contends that the trial court erred in refusing to allow the defendant to cross-examine the six-year-old victim about testimony she gave during the competency voir dire, that the trial court erred in admitting the testimony of Michael Barrier in violation of the clergy-communicant privilege, and that the trial court permitted the prosecutor to impermissibly comment on the defendant’s failure to testify. The assignments and contentions are without merit.

The defendant was charged with the first degree rape of…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Griffin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  2. Griffin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  3. United States v. John FlanneryCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1971
  4. State v. MasonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
  5. State v. WoodsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. SkipperSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1994
  2. State v. MartinWashington Supreme Court · 1999
  3. State v. MartinWashington Supreme Court · 1999
  4. State v. PulleyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2006
  5. People v. BraggMichigan Court of Appeals · 2012

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API