Legal Opinion

Getty v. Peters

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 31, 1890PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Error to Kalkaska. (Aldrich, J.) Ejectment. Plaintiff brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtMorse, J.

This is an action of ejectment. It was tried before the circuit judge of the Kalkaska circuit court without a jury.

He finds that June 4, 1885, Addie B. Getty, wife of the plaintiff, entered into a contract with George W.Peters, husband of the defandant, to sell him lots 7 and 8 in the village of Kalkaska for $200, payable $25 down, and the balance on or before three years from date, with interest at 10 per cent., payable annually. Peters was to pay all taxes assessed on said premises from said date, and was to keep the buildings insured for the benefit of Mrs. Getty. When the contract was…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Converse v. BlumrichMichigan Supreme Court · 1866

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. E. L. Husting Co. v. Coca Cola Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1931
  2. Weitzel v. LeysonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1909
  3. Donnelly v. LyonsMichigan Supreme Court · 1913
  4. Bartlett v. SmithMichigan Supreme Court · 1906
  5. Woloveck v. SchuellerOhio Court of Appeals · 1922

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API