Legal Opinion

Weitzel v. Leyson

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided May 21, 1909PublishedCited by 15 opinions

Appeal’from Circuit Court,’Hand’County. Hon. Loring E-GaRRy, Judge. Action by S. E. Weitzel, administrator of C. A. Sanford, deceased, and others, against E. J. Leyson and another, to recover on account of a sale of land by defendants to decedent. Erom a judgment for plaintiffs and from an order denying a new trial, defendants appeal.

1Opinion of the Court

WHITING, 'J.

This cause was tried before the court without a jury. The court made and filed its findings of facts and conclusions of law herein, and entered judgment in conformity with said conclusion's. The cause comes before this court upon an appeal from such judgment and from an order denying a new trial herein.

Upon the trial of this cause the defendants, appellants in this court, asked the trial court to make findings and conclusions in their favor, which findings and conclusions were refused. ‘The appellants specified as error both the making of certain findings as found by the court,…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Cleary v. FolgerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Bigler v. . MorganNew York Court of Appeals · 1879
  3. Burks v. DaviesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  4. George v. ConhaimSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1888
  5. Gregory v. ChristianSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1890

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Renner v. CrismanSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1964
  2. Brown v. PetersonArizona Supreme Court · 1925
  3. Hauert v. KaufmanSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1922
  4. Nichols & Shepard Co. v. MarshallSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1911
  5. Rossum v. WickSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1953

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API