Miller v. City of Lake City
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
Robert H. Dudley, Justice.
The appellant appeals from the Chancellor’s refusal to grant an unlimited variance from Lake City’s zoning ordinance. We affirm the Chancellor’s ruling.
In 1982, Lake City passed a zoning ordinance and, pursuant to that ordinance, appellant’s property was zoned R-l. It is undisputed that under the terms of the zoning ordinance appellant’s use of her land was restricted to a single family residence with only one main building to be located on the lot. The city ordinance did not provide for a zoning board; instead, it provided that the city council alone could grant a…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Foote's Dixie Dandy, Inc. v. McHenrySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1980
- Padgett v. HastonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1983
- Fort Smith v. United States Rubber Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1931
- Klinger v. City of FayettevilleSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1988
- Greene County v. ParagouldSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1924
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Arkansas State Highway Commission v. TownsendSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1993
- City of Russellville v. HodgesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1997
- Arkansas Department of Human Services v. Estate of LewisSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1996
- Chism v. CurtnerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2010
- Duchac v. City of Hot SpringsCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1999
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.