Klinger v. City of Fayetteville
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
David Newbern, Justice.
This is an appeal of the dismissal of a complaint which sought damages because the appellee, City of Fayetteville, wrongfully let a contract to do archeological work without taking bids. We affirm the trial court’s determination that the complaint of the appellant, Timothy Klinger, did not state facts sufficient to state a claim upon which relief could be granted. Ark. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6).
The background for this case can be found in Klinger v. City of Fayetteville, 293 Ark. 128, 732 S.W.2d 859 (1987), where we held that the city was bound by Ark. Code Ann. § 14-47-138…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Sutter Bros. Construction Co. v. City of LeavenworthSupreme Court of Kansas · 1985
- Swinerton & Walberg Co. v. City of Inglewood-Los Angeles County Civic Center AuthorityCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
- Gulf Oil Corp. v. Clark CountyNevada Supreme Court · 1978
- Klinger v. City of FayettevilleSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1987
- City of Scottsdale v. DeemCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1976
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Conway Corp. v. Construction Engineers, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1989
- Miller v. City of Lake CitySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1990
- Milligan v. BurrowCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1996
- Ralph L. Wadsworth Construction Co. v. Salt Lake CountyCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1991
- C.N. Robinson Lighting Supply Co. v. Board of EducationCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1992
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.