Legal Opinion

Securities & Exchange Commission v. Bauer

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided July 22, 2013No. 12-2860PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ZAGEL, District Judge.

The Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC” or the “Commission”) charged Jilaine H. Bauer (“Bauer”) with insider trading in connection with a mutual fund redemption she made in October of 2000. The district court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin (the “district court”) granted summary judgment to the SEC and Bauer appealed. This case is unusual — it is one of few instances in which the SEC has brought insider trading claims in connection with a mutual fund redemption. No federal court has opined on the applicability of insider trading prohibitions to the trade of…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Ernst & Ernst v. HochfelderSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Basic Inc. v. LevinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  3. TSC Industries, Inc. v. Northway, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Affiliated Ute Citizens of Utah v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. Chiarella v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1980

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Alejandro Yeatts v. Zimmer Biomet Holdings, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2019
  2. Brotherston v. Putnam InvestmentsCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2018
  3. Securities & Exchange Commission v. Nutmeg Group, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2016
  4. Rubinstein v. GonzalezDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2017
  5. United States Securities & Exchange Commission v. KameliDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2017

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API