Legal Opinion

In Re Woodell

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided November 23, 1960No. 522PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPabkeh, J.

Steve and Beulah Woodell assign as errors: (1) The recital in Judge Hooks’ order dated 7 June 1960 that it appears to him that it would be to the best interest of Donna Faye Woodell that petitioner’s motion for a modification of Judge Sharp’s order be heard at the earliest possible date, and that Steve and Beulah Woodell have had sufficient notice of the motion, and that no further notice of such motion should be given; (2) the signing of the order.

G.S. 1-581 reads: “When notice of a motion is necessary, it must be served ten days before the time appointed for the hearing; but the court or…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Collins v. North Carolina State Highway & Public Works CommissionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
  2. James v. PretlowSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Watkins v. NelsonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2000
  2. McDermott v. DoughertyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2005
  3. Brandon v. BrandonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1971
  4. Story v. StoryCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1975
  5. Spitzer v. LewarkSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API