Legal Opinion

Story v. Story

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided November 5, 1975No. 7522DC611PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HEDRICK, Judge.

Defendant first contends that the trial court was without authority to dismiss the appeal in that defendant did not receive the five-day statutory notice provided for in Rule 6(a) for hearings on motions. The record shows that defendant received notice on 16 April 1975 and attended the hearing on 22 April 1975. As provided by Rule 6(a) in not counting Saturdays and Sundays, it is true that defendant had less than five days notice; but defendant has brought forth no argument that he was in any way prejudiced by lack of proper notice. Brandon v. Brandon, 10 N.C. App. 457, 179…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Collins v. North Carolina State Highway & Public Works CommissionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
  2. Brandon v. BrandonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1971
  3. In Re WoodellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
  4. Staton v. BlantonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Raintree Corp. v. RoweCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1978
  2. Blackburn v. CarboneCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2010
  3. Adair v. AdairCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983
  4. Gates v. GatesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
  5. Raintree Homeowners Ass'n v. Raintree Corp.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API