Legal Opinion

Thorne v. Bell

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided September 6, 1994No. Docket 142116, 142122, 145272, 145273PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDoctoroff, C.J.

In Docket Nos. 142116 and 142122, plaintiffs Thomas W. Thorne and Sandra H. Thorne appeal as of right from a May 17, 1991, order dismissing their complaints against defendant Robert Bell and defendants Roger Cayo, James L. Stevens, Roccy M. DeFrancesco and Larry Leatz (defendants Cayo et al) and dismissing their answer to the counterclaim of defendants Cayo et al for failure to timely reveal trial witnesses and exhibits. In Docket Nos. 145272 and 145273, plaintiffs appeal as of right from a September 25, 1991, judgment of default entered against them as a result of their failure to timely…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Dean v. TuckerMichigan Court of Appeals · 1990
  2. Mink v. MastersMichigan Court of Appeals · 1994
  3. Frankenmuth Mutual Insurance v. ACO, Inc.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1992
  4. Grubor Enterprises, Inc v. KortidisMichigan Court of Appeals · 1993

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Kalamazoo Oil Co. v. BoermanMichigan Court of Appeals · 2000
  2. Hardrick v. Auto Club InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 2011
  3. Bass v. CombsMichigan Court of Appeals · 2000
  4. LeGendre v. Monroe CountyMichigan Court of Appeals · 1999
  5. Brent Thayne v. Stephan BradshawMichigan Court of Appeals · 2017

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API