Legal Opinion

Baldinger v. Ann Arbor Railroad

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided May 4, 1964No. Calendar 41, Docket 50,136PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBlack, J.

The plaintiff husband sued under the statute for wrongful death of his wife, Mildred Baldinger. Mrs. Baldinger’s death resulted from a collision at grade of defendant’s train with an automobile occupied by her. Yerdict and judgment for defendant. On appeal the decisive question is brief-stated by plaintiff’s counsel:

“Did the trial court err in eliminating from jury consideration plaintiff’s theory that the railroad crossing at which the automobile-train collision occurred was an ‘extra hazardous crossing’, requiring additional safeguards and precautions on the part of the defendant railroad?”

T…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Grand Trunk Railway Co. v. IvesSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  2. Kaminski v. Grand Trunk Western RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1956
  3. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railroad v. MillerMichigan Supreme Court · 1872
  4. Guggenheim v. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1887
  5. Staal v. Grand Rapids & Indiana RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1885

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Schedlbauer v. Chris-Craft Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Emery v. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1964
  3. Ebel v. Saginaw County Board of Road CommissionersMichigan Supreme Court · 1972
  4. Beasley v. Grand Trunk Western RailroadMichigan Court of Appeals · 1979
  5. Johnson v. Grand Trunk Western RailroadMichigan Court of Appeals · 1975

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API